Lord Feverstone's Commentary

Musings of a Christian monarchist on life, government, society, theology, etc.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Matt LeBlanc's "Child" Support

Article

Calling LeBlanc a "high-wage earner," however, the court ordered the actor to fork over $15,000 a month in child support for the couple's two-year-old daughter, Marina, and ruled that Dad was 100 percent responsible for any future private school tuition, uninsured medical expenses, nanny services and Marina's college fund.

Melissa LeBlanc (née McKnight) also has two children from a previous marriage. She and her almost-ex will share joint physical and legal custody of Marina.


What toddler requires all of this money? Is a toddler really that expensive to care for? This sounds more like alimony to me, especially given the fact Matt LeBlanc also has joint physical and legal custody. Is this justice or just another shakedown because a guy "can afford it?"

Methinks Matt LeBlanc's career is on a downward slope; if he has not managed his finances well, all of this money he will have to cough up could really prove to be a burden over the years. Will this amount ever be re-evaluated? Of course not. [sarcasm]Because he is wealthy now, he always will be.[/sarcasm]

Is it any wonder more and more men are hesitant to "tie the knot" these days?

2 Comments:

Blogger ChicagoMan said...

Typical Skank, the money is starting to dry up so she divorces him,LOL.

NEVER EVER under any circumstances do anything that reveals your true worth to women if you want to find someone that is into just "you" and not your wallet.

4:49 PM  
Blogger Lord Feverstone said...

> Typical Skank, the money is starting to dry up so she divorces him,LOL.

I thought the same thing. "Time to cash out and move onto the next sucker."

3:55 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home